Do you have to post a salary range in Minnesota job postings?
Minnesota's pay-transparency law generally requires employers with 30 or more employees to include a starting salary range (or a fixed rate) and a general description of benefits in job postings. The requirement is relatively new, so confirm current rules.
Minnesota generally requires employers with 30 or more employees to disclose a starting salary range (or a fixed pay rate) plus a general description of benefits and other compensation in each job posting, including postings for remote roles that could be filled from Minnesota.
The requirement took effect in 2025 and the details may still be settling. Confirm the current obligations, including how the employee-count threshold is measured, before relying on them for a specific posting.
Risky phrasing
“Minneapolis. Warehouse Associate. Pay DOE.”
Compliant rewrite
Minneapolis. Warehouse Associate. $20–$24 per hour, plus benefits. (Minnesota generally requires a salary range and benefits; confirm current rules.)
The law at a glance
- Law
- Salary Ranges in Job Postings (Minnesota pay transparency law, enacted via the 2024 omnibus labor bill, SF 3852)Minn. Stat. § 181.173
- In effect
- January 1, 2025
- Who’s covered
- Employers with 30 or more employees at one or more sites in Minnesota — including private companies, nonprofits, and state, county, city, school-district and other government employers.
- Penalties
- As of this writing, Minn. Stat. § 181.173 sets out no specific penalty amounts, and the section does not appear in the enforcement lists of Minnesota's employee civil-action statute (Minn. Stat. § 181.171) or the Labor Commissioner's compliance-order statute (Minn. Stat. § 177.27). Enforcement is generally expected to come through the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and the state Attorney General; confirm the current posture with counsel.
What that means for a posting
- Include a starting salary range in every posting for a specific job opening: the minimum and maximum annual salary or hourly range of compensation, based on the employer's good-faith estimate at the time of posting.
- The range may not be open-ended — "$60,000 and up" generally does not satisfy the statute. An employer that does not plan to offer a range must list a fixed pay rate instead.
- Add a general description of all benefits and other compensation to be offered to the person hired, including but not limited to health and retirement benefits.
- Treat "posting" broadly: the statute covers any electronic or printed solicitation for a specific available position that includes qualifications, whether the employer posts it directly or a recruiter or staffing agency posts it on the employer's behalf.
- Measure coverage by Minnesota headcount: the law generally applies to employers with 30 or more employees at one or more sites in Minnesota.
Remote and out-of-state postings
The statute does not expressly address remote or out-of-state roles. Coverage turns on employing 30 or more people at one or more Minnesota sites, so a purely out-of-state employer with no Minnesota workforce generally is not covered. For covered employers, commentators describe the law's reach over remote postings as unsettled; the cautious practice many employers follow is to include a range in any posting that could be filled by someone working from Minnesota.
How it’s actually enforced
The statute itself does not name an enforcing agency or set out penalties, which is unusual among state pay-transparency laws — employment-law commentators generally describe the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) and the state Attorney General as the expected enforcers. The softening fact: as of this writing there is no express fine schedule and no express private right of action in the statute's text. The cautionary fact: job postings are public, so a missing range is visible to every candidate, competitor and regulator, and the legislature can add teeth in a later session. Don't build a posting practice around the current absence of a penalty clause.
Common follow-ups
Does Minnesota's pay transparency law apply to remote jobs or out-of-state employers?+
The statute defines a covered employer as one with 30 or more employees "at one or more sites in Minnesota," so an out-of-state company generally is not covered unless it has that Minnesota headcount. The law is silent on remote roles, and commentators call its reach over remote postings unsettled. The cautious approach for covered employers is to include a range in any posting that could be filled from Minnesota, and to confirm the current reading with counsel.
Do staffing agencies and third-party recruiters have to include salary ranges?+
Generally yes, when they recruit for a covered employer. The statute defines a covered "posting" to include recruitment done "indirectly through a third party," so an ad a recruiter or staffing agency runs on a covered employer's behalf generally needs the same salary range and benefits description. How the rule applies when an agency based in Minnesota recruits for positions outside the state is less settled.
Can applicants sue over a missing salary range, and who enforces the law?+
As of this writing, section 181.173 does not create an express private right of action, and it is not listed in Minn. Stat. § 181.171, the statute that lets individuals bring civil actions for various other wage violations. Employment-law commentators generally describe the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and the Attorney General as the expected enforcers. That posture could change through amendment or agency guidance, so confirm with counsel.
Can the range be open-ended, like "$60,000 and up"?+
Generally no. The statute says a salary range may not be open-ended — it must state the minimum and maximum annual salary or hourly range of compensation, based on the employer's good-faith estimate at the time of posting. An employer that does not plan to offer a range can list a fixed pay rate instead.
Do bonuses, commissions and benefits have to be in the posting?+
The posting must include a "general description of all of the benefits and other compensation," and the statute specifically mentions health and retirement benefits. It asks for a general description rather than exact dollar values, but it does not define how detailed that description must be — a plain-English summary of benefits, bonus or commission eligibility, and other compensation is the common approach. Confirm specifics with counsel.
Does the law cover internal postings and promotions?+
The statute covers "any solicitation intended to recruit job applicants for a specific available position" and does not carve out internal postings. A promotion decision made without any posting generally would not trigger it, but if you post an internal opening that lists qualifications, the cautious reading is that the salary-range and benefits disclosures apply.
Check your own posting in seconds.
Paste a job posting. FairHire quotes the exact line that carries risk — a missing range, age-coded wording, a vague pay promise — and shows a safer way to say it.
Audit my job post freeSources
- Minn. Stat. § 181.173 — Salary Ranges in Job Postings (Minnesota Revisor of Statutes)
- Minn. Stat. § 181.171 — Civil actions (Minnesota Revisor of Statutes)
- Minn. Stat. § 177.27 — Commissioner's powers; compliance orders; penalties (Minnesota Revisor of Statutes)
- Seyfarth Shaw — Minnesota Enacts Pay Transparency Law to Require Salary Range Disclosure in Job Postings
- Fafinski Mark & Johnson — New Minnesota Law Requires Wage and Benefit Disclosure in Job Postings
- SHRM — Minnesota Job Postings Must Comply with New Compensation Disclosure Requirements
Last reviewed July 8, 2026. Laws change — always confirm current rules for your jurisdiction.FairHire is an informational tool, not legal advice. Have qualified counsel review your hiring questions before use.